Actian Corporation v. Radisys Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ACTIAN CORPORATION, Case No. 22-cv-00895-PJH Plaintiff,

v. DISCOVERY ORDER

RADISYS CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 50 Defendants.

13 Before the court is a discovery letter brief. The jointly-submitted letter brief details five areas of ongoing discovery disputes. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. The first four issues in the letter brief all appear to be based on defendants’ delay in production, summarized as follows: 1. Whether defendant Anam Technologies, Ltd., may delay further responses to discovery requests until its pending motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Dkt. 47) is resolved; 2. Whether defendant Radisys Corporation may delay scheduling depositions of fact witnesses until it anticipates completing associated document…