Stemmelin

Stemmelin v. Matterport, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20223:20-cv-04168California443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN STEMMELIN, Plaintiff, No. C 20-04168 WHA

v.

MATTERPORT, INC., et al., ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendants.

AND VACATING HEARING

15 16 In this false and deceptive advertising action, plaintiff seeks to modify the scheduling order to file a motion for partial summary judgment. This motion is appropriate for disposition on the papers. See Civ. L.R. 7-6. This is not the first time a party herein has sought to modify the schedule of this litigation. As detailed in an October 2021 order, the parties largely squandered seven months of discovery opportunity, with defendant producing only eleven documents, and plaintiff failing to raise any issues whatsoever with the Court until a mere three weeks before the deadline for the motion for class certification. The October 2021 order gave the parties a revised schedule and left them with a warning: “This order stresses to both parties that further changes to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.