Chiprez

Chiprez v. Adame

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20224:20-cv-00307California4,371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FROYLAN MEDINA CHIPREZ,

Case No. 20-cv-00307-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.

M. ADAME,

7 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility (“CSATF”) and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 stemming for alleged constitutional violations that took place at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), where he was previously incarcerated. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 6. The operative complaint is the fourth amended complaint (“4AC”). Dkt. 21. Venue is proper because the events giving rise to plaintiff’s claims are alleged to have occurred at SVSP, which is located in this judicial district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The 4AC is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). II. BACKGROUND In its July 7, 2022…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.