Maguire
Maguire v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
STRICT SC
CSDM rien “OURS OUT Oa Pb22
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
.. on 8.0, OF NY MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: ACETAMINOPHEN - ASD/ADHD MDL No. 3643
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
TRANSFER ORDER
Before the Panel:* Plaintiff in one action (Thompson) moves under 28 U.S.C, § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of California or, alternatively, the District of Minnesota. This litigation currently consists of eighteen actions pending in seven districts, as listed on Schedule A.' Since the filing of the motion, the Panel has been notified of 47 related actions.” All responding plaintiffs support centralization, but vary on the appropriate transferee district. Most support the Northern District of California or the District of Minnesota as their first or second choice for transferee district. Certain other plaintiffs suggest the Western District of Missouri, the Central District of California, or the District of Nevada. All responding defendants oppose centralization.? If the actions are centralized over their objections, CVS, Costco, Walgreens, Rite Aid, and…