Diggs

Diggs v. Securitas Securities Services USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20224:22-cv-01285California1,776 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ASHLEY DIGGS, Case No. 22-cv-01285-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

REMAND AND GRANTING MOTION

v. TO DISMISS

SECURITAS SECURITIES SERVICES Re: Dkt. Nos. 4,

USA, INC.,

11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Ashley Diggs’ motion to remand and Defendant Securitas Securities Services USA, Inc.’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. Nos. 4, 7. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion to remand and GRANTS the motion to dismiss. I. MOTION TO REMAND In March 2022, Defendant timely removed this case to federal court based on diversity of citizenship. See Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff has moved to remand this case to Santa Clara Superior Court. Dkt. No. 7. “Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.