Faizi

Faizi v. Temori

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20225:22-cv-04224California5,645 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, an individual Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD and derivatively on behalf of FALAFEL FLAME, INC.,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

v. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 26 BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff Ahmad Mukhtar Faizi filed a “Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Money Damages and Injunctive Relief,” on behalf of nominal defendant Falafel Flame, Inc. (“Falafel Flame” or “company”) against two of Falafel Flame’s directors, Baktash Temori and Masoud Rustakhis, as well as a number of entities, including Falafel Flame restaurants in Dublin, Tracy, and Concord, California; several restaurants or entities named “Falafel Flame” in Fremont, Hayward, Sunnyvale, Upland, and San Jose, California; and several “Blaze BBQ” entities.1 Now before the Court is Mr. Faizi’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Defendants oppose the motion. Upon consideration of the moving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.