In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO DISCLOSE PROTECTED
MATERIAL Docket No. 1385
12 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to disclose protected material (i.e., confidential information at all “levels” as designated by Defendants) to their expert, Dr. Strobos. The Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing is VACATED, and the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants have not shown that disclosure of protected material to Dr. Strobos would cause them any harm or prejudice. Accordingly, the Court orders that Dr. Strobos be allowed to review the information, so long as he signs the acknowledgments in the protective orders and agrees to be bound by those protective orders. Dr. Strobos is permitted to review the material whether to…