Fox
Fox v. Uribe
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LEONARD JAMES FOX,
Case No. 18-cv-07221 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AFTER
ADDITIONAL BRIEFING
T. URIBE, et al.,
Defendants. (Docket No. 33)
17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical personnel at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). The amended complaint is the operative complaint in this action. Dkt. No. 15. Finding the amended complaint stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, the Court ordered service upon Defendants. Dkt. No. 16. Defendants Dr. Nguyen, Dr. K. Kumar, and Dr. B Brizendine filed a motion for
25 1 All page references herein are to the Docket pages shown in the header to each document and brief cited, unless otherwise…