CLAY

CLAY v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20223:22-cv-03676California1,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TOMMIE L. CLAY, Case No. 22-cv-03676-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO REMAND; VACATING

HEARING

FCA US LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

12 Before the Court is plaintiff Tommie L. Clay's ("Clay") Motion to Remand, filed September 13, 2022. Defendant FCA US LLC ("FCA") has filed opposition, to which Clay has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for determination on the parties' respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for October 21, 2022, and rules as follows. In his Complaint, initially filed in state court, Clay asserts four Causes of Action against defendant FCA, each arising under state law and based on his allegations that he purchased a 2013 Dodge Challenger, that he entered into a "warranty contract" with FCA in connection with said purchase, that "[d]efects and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.