Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20223:20-cv-06754California862 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GOOGLE LLC, Plaintiff, No. C 20-06754 WHA

v.

ORDER ENTERING SUMMARY

SONOS, INC., JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF SONOS AS TO VALIDITY OF THE '885 Defendant. PATENT

15 A July 2022 order granted Sonos’s motion for summary judgment of infringement of claim 1 of United States Patent No. 10,848,885 (Dkt. No. 309). That order also rejected Google’s arguments — made in both its opposition brief and its own patent showdown motion papers — that the claim was invalid. Specifically, that order rejected Google’s arguments that claim 1 of the ’885 patent covered unpatentable subject-matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and that the claim lacked written description support under 35 U.S.C. § 112. In light of that order, Google was ordered to show cause as to why summary judgment should not be entered in favor of Sonos on the issue of validity (Dkt. No. 339). Both parties have now responded (Dkt. Nos. 349, 351). In its response,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.