Drevaleva

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, Case No. 22-cv-01984-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. PRE-FILING APPLICATION TO FILE

THE FIRST MOTION TO VACATE

DORIS NG, et al., JUDGMENT Defendants. Docket No.

12 13 The plaintiff asks the Court for permission to file her a first motion to vacate the judgment in this case primarily because she “erroneously asserted that the DLSE had been served with a Summons and with [her] Original December 29, 2016 Complaint No. 3:16-cv07414-LB.” (Docket No. 52 at 2.) “Amendment or alteration is appropriate under Rule 59(e) if (1) the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) the district court committed clear error or made an initial decision that was manifestly unjust, or (3) there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Zimmerman v. City of Oakland, 255 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2001). “Rule 60(b) provides for reconsideration only upon a…