Arroyo

Arroyo v. WRC Huntington, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20223:21-cv-00953California511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAFAEL ARROYO, Case No. 21-cv-00953-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

v. APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF

STIPULATED JUDGMENT

WRC HUNTINGTON, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo applies for an order by this Court “entering the Judgment as stipulated by the parties on 6/4/2021.” ECF No. 17. However, on February 15, 2022, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). ECF No. 16. At that time, the Court did not retain jurisdiction over this matter, and no other order had been entered regarding the parties’ settlement agreement. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute. . . . It is to be presumed that a cause lies outside this limited jurisdiction, and the burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.