Brown

Brown v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20224:20-cv-03664California4,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 CHASOM BROWN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-03664-YGR (SVK)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON GOOGLE’S MOTION TO

v. STRIKE

GOOGLE LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 733 Defendant.

The Court has reviewed Google’s Motion to Strike (“Motion”; Dkt. 733), the attendant briefs and evidence, GOOG-BRWN-00857642-646 with redactions (“Disputed Document”; Dkt. 707-3), and the relevant case and statutory law. The Court determines that this matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that Google has WAIVED any attorney-client privilege and attorney work-product protection as to the unredacted portions of the Disputed Document only, and on that basis DENIES the Motion. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND A. Chronology of Relevant Motion Practice Before this Court Tedious but essential, the Court provides the following context for the present motion: • April 2022;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.