Callahan

Callahan v. Paychex North America Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20223:21-cv-05670California4,504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 STANLEY CALLAHAN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05670-CRB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER COMPELLING

v.

ARBITRATION

PAYCHEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Defendant.

Defendant Paychex North America Inc. (“PNA”) moves to compel arbitration in accordance with an arbitration agreement signed by Plaintiffs Stanley Callahan and Faisal Gailani while employed at PNA. As explained below, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7-1(b), and GRANTS PNA’s motion to compel. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Stanley Callahan and Faisal Gailani, who worked as Sales Representatives at Defendant Paychex North America, Inc. (PNA) from 2019 to 2020, allege that PNA violated various provisions of the California Labor Code. See SAC (dkt. 19). They claim that PNA misclassified them as outside sales representatives, failed to issue accurate itemized statements, failed to pay overtime, and failed to reimburse for business…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.