Callahan
Callahan v. Paychex North America Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 STANLEY CALLAHAN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05670-CRB
Plaintiffs,
ORDER COMPELLING
v.
ARBITRATION
PAYCHEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Defendant.
Defendant Paychex North America Inc. (“PNA”) moves to compel arbitration in accordance with an arbitration agreement signed by Plaintiffs Stanley Callahan and Faisal Gailani while employed at PNA. As explained below, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7-1(b), and GRANTS PNA’s motion to compel. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Stanley Callahan and Faisal Gailani, who worked as Sales Representatives at Defendant Paychex North America, Inc. (PNA) from 2019 to 2020, allege that PNA violated various provisions of the California Labor Code. See SAC (dkt. 19). They claim that PNA misclassified them as outside sales representatives, failed to issue accurate itemized statements, failed to pay overtime, and failed to reimburse for business…