Hawkins

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL HAWKINS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08670-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CHIP

H. ZOEGALL'S MOTION FOR

v. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CHIP H. ZOEGALL and CENTRICFM

SOLUTIONS, INC.,

11 Defendants.

13 Before the Court is defendant Chip H. Zoegall's ("Zoegall") Motion for Partial 14 Summary Judgment, filed August 24, 2022. Plaintiffs Daniel Hawkins ("Hawkins") and 15 DD Restaurant Group, Inc. ("DD Restaurant Group") have filed opposition, to which 16 Zoegall has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 18 In the instant action, plaintiffs allege that Hawkins entered into a contract with both 19 defendants, under which contract defendants were to renovate plaintiffs' business, and 20 that defendants, who were not licensed to perform construction work in California, failed 21 to perform satisfactorily under the contract. By the instant motion, Zoegall seeks…