Davidson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GILLIAN DAVIDSON, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01050-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

SPROUT FOODS INC.,

13 Defendant.

15 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Gillian and Samuel Davidson bring this putative class action against Defendant Sprout Foods Inc. (“Sprout”), which sells baby and toddler food products. The First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) avers violations of California law based on statements made on various Sprout products that tout the nutrients included in them, such as “3g of Protein” or “4g of Fiber.” Defendant moves under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the FAC in its entirety. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. Plaintiffs have still not plausibly claimed that Defendant’s labeling is misleading, and thus their claims under the California False Advertising Act (“FAL”), the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), common law fraud, and…