Beale

Beale v. Redbubble, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20224:22-cv-06364California3,058 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND and FACTS2

Defendant TP Apparel’s motion to dismiss (“Defendant TP Apparel motion”) (Dkt. 12), was filed July 30, 2022, together with the Declaration of Thomas Wood (Dkt. 12-1) (“Wood Declaration”) (“Defendant TP Apparel”); Defendant Redbubble’s motion for transfer (Dkt. 13), was filed August 1, 2022, together with the Declaration of James Toy, Dkt. 13-3, (“Toy Declaration”), along with Exhibits A – E (“Exh(s). ___ to Toy Declaration”). On September 9, 2022, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff’s Memorandum Of Law In Response And Opposition To Defendant TP Apparel LLC’s Motion To Dismiss And Defendant’s Joint Motion To Transfer (Dkt. 17) (“Plaintiff’s Memorandum”). On September 16, 2022, Defendant TP Apparel filed Defendant TP Apparel LLC’s Reply

Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Motion For Improper Venue Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3) And 29 U.S.C. § 1400(a) (Dkt. 18) (“Defendant TP Apparel’s Reply”); on the same date, Defendant Redbubble filed its Reply Memorandum Of Law In Support of Redbubble, Inc.’s Motion To Transfer (Dkt. 19) (“Defendant Redbubble’s Reply”). Oral argument was deemed unnecessary. Defendant TP Apparel, a wholly owned subsidiary of Defendant Redbubble,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.