Lai

Lai v. Coinbase Global, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20223:22-cv-03067California2,100 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS CHAN LAI,

Case No. 22-cv-03067-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., et al., 10 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION This case was brought by Plaintiff Dennis Chan Lai against Coinbase Global, Inc. and Coinbase, Inc (collectively, “Coinbase”). Lai and Coinbase consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and on August 25, 2022, the undersigned granted Coinbase’s unopposed motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e). See dkt. 13 (“August 25 Order”). In the August 25 Order, the Court found that “Plaintiff’s allegations regarding diversity jurisdiction are incomplete, that his factual allegations are almost unintelligible and that the basis for his claims is unclear.” The Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint that is in compliance with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than September 9, 2022. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.