Hogan

Hogan v. Napa County District Attorney

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20223:22-cv-04052California1,176 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAMBRA HOGAN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04052-JSC

Plaintiffs,

SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO

v. 28 U.S.C. § 1915

NAPA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Re: Dkt. No. 1 et al., 11 Defendants.

12 The Court previously granted Plaintiffs’ Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Dkt. No. 5.) It must now review the complaint’s allegations under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because Plaintiffs’ claims do not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, the Court gives Plaintiffs the opportunity to amend the complaint. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Tambra Hogan and Keith Rivers allege that, after a September 2021 altercation with Victor Ramon Fregoso,2 Defendants have failed to pursue justice against Mr. Fregoso, failed to treat Plaintiffs as victims, and discriminated against Plaintiffs on the basis of race. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiffs cite the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Art. I § 7 of the California Constitution, and a list…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.