Hogan
Hogan v. Napa County District Attorney
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAMBRA HOGAN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04052-JSC
Plaintiffs,
SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO
v. 28 U.S.C. § 1915
NAPA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Re: Dkt. No. 1 et al., 11 Defendants.
12 The Court previously granted Plaintiffs’ Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Dkt. No. 5.) It must now review the complaint’s allegations under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because Plaintiffs’ claims do not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, the Court gives Plaintiffs the opportunity to amend the complaint. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Tambra Hogan and Keith Rivers allege that, after a September 2021 altercation with Victor Ramon Fregoso,2 Defendants have failed to pursue justice against Mr. Fregoso, failed to treat Plaintiffs as victims, and discriminated against Plaintiffs on the basis of race. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiffs cite the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Art. I § 7 of the California Constitution, and a list…