Austin v. ABC Legal
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 21-cv-09076-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. RECONSIDER
ABC LEGAL, Re: Dkt. No. 100 Defendant.
12 On May 31, 2022 the Court dismissed plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint with prejudice and entered final judgment in this case. Dkt. No. 88 (dismissal), 89 (judgment). On June 22, 2022, plaintiff filed a one-sentence “Motion for Correction, Leave to Appeal, Alter Judgment.” Dkt. No. 94. The Court denied that motion as it failed to state with particularity the grounds for seeking the order” and “state the relief sought.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b). Dkt. No. 98. On August 31, 2022, plaintiff filed a new “Motion for Reconsideration (as Judgment is Wrong) with Additional details, and information as the District Court requested,”1 and set it for hearing on November 4, 2022. Dkt. No. 100. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without hearing, pursuant to Local Rule …