Ulep

Ulep v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20225:22-cv-02617California1,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALEX ULEP, Case No. 22-cv-02617-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE v.

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a prisoner at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.