Zheng

Zheng v. Maroun

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20223:21-cv-07925California1,813 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAN ZHENG, Case No. 21-cv-07925-SK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE

v.

JOSEPH MAROUN, et al., Regarding Docket Nos. 40, 41 Defendants.

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motion to strike filed by Defendants Fredrick William Voigtmann and Law Office of Fred Voigtmann (“Defendants”). The Court finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument and thus VACATES the hearing scheduled for October 31, 2022. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having carefully considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion for the reasons set forth below. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ request for judicial notice. Fed. R. Evid. 201. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ran Zheng (“Plaintiff”) initially filed her complaint against Joseph Maroun Jr., Joseph Maroun Sr., and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.