Jackson v. Applied Materials Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KEVIN F JACKSON, Case No. 20-cv-06007-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING STAY OF
v. JUDGMENT
APPLIED MATERIALS CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 86 et al., 12 Defendants.
13 On October 7, 2022, the Court confirmed the arbitrator’s interim award of summary disposition and final award of attorneys’ fees and costs, and entered judgment accordingly. Dkt. Nos. 94, 95. Plaintiff Kevin Jackson previously filed a declaration, Dkt. No. 86, that the Court construed in part as a motion to stay the judgment pending appeal. Dkt. No. 96. Defendants Applied Materials, Inc. (“Applied Materials”) and Keith Dupen (collectively “Defendants”) oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 97. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b) the Court deems this matter submitted on the papers and denies Mr. Jackson’s motion. As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that execution of its judgment is automatically stayed for 30 days. Fed. R. Civ. P.…