Jackson v. Applied Materials Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20225:20-cv-06007California907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KEVIN F JACKSON, Case No. 20-cv-06007-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING STAY OF

v. JUDGMENT

APPLIED MATERIALS CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 86 et al., 12 Defendants.

13 On October 7, 2022, the Court confirmed the arbitrator’s interim award of summary disposition and final award of attorneys’ fees and costs, and entered judgment accordingly. Dkt. Nos. 94, 95. Plaintiff Kevin Jackson previously filed a declaration, Dkt. No. 86, that the Court construed in part as a motion to stay the judgment pending appeal. Dkt. No. 96. Defendants Applied Materials, Inc. (“Applied Materials”) and Keith Dupen (collectively “Defendants”) oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 97. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b) the Court deems this matter submitted on the papers and denies Mr. Jackson’s motion. As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that execution of its judgment is automatically stayed for 30 days. Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.