Latorre

Latorre v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20224:22-cv-02922California1,302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 NOEL V. LATORRE, Case No. 4:22-cv-02922-YGR Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ARTICLE III 8 v. STANDING

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

TO PLAINTIFF NOEL V. LATORRE AND PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL OF RECORD: You are HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by no later than five (5) business days from the date of this order why this case should not be dismissed for lack of standing. It is well established the Court has an independent obligation to examine a litigant’s standing under Article III. To have Article III standing, plaintiff must show that he “(1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330, 338 (2016) (citations omitted). An injury in fact must be “particularized,” and it must be …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.