In re Cloudera, Inc. Securities Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20223:19-cv-03221California10,725 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE CLOUDERA, INC.

SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 19-cv-03221-MMC 8 This Document Relates To: O AMRD ENER D ED DIS CM OIS MS PIN LAG I NS TE COND ALL ACTIONS Re: Dkt. No. 234

12 Before the Court is defendants Cloudera, Inc. (“Cloudera” or “the Company”), Intel Corporation (“Intel”), Thomas J. Reilly (“Reilly”), Jim Frankola (“Frankola”), Michael A. Olson (“Olson”), Ping Li (“Li”), Martin I. Cole (“Cole”), Kimberly L. Hammonds (“Hammonds”),1 Rosemary Schooler (“Schooler”), Steve J. Sordello (“Sordello”), Michael A. Stankey (“Stankey”), Priya Jain (“Jain”), Robert Bearden (“Bearden”), Paul Cormier (“Cormier”), Peter Fenton (“Fenton”), and Kevin Klausmeyer’s (“Klausmeyer”) Motion, filed August 5, 2021, to “Dismiss Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint (‘SAC’).” Plaintiffs Mariusz J. Klin and the Mariusz J. Klin MD PA 401K Profit Sharing Plan, Robert Boguslawski, and Arthur P. Hoffman have filed opposition, to which defendants have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.