Shkipin

Homelight, Inc. v. Shkipin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20225:22-cv-03119California2,545 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HOMELIGHT, INC., Case No. 22-cv-03119-TLT

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

DMITRY SHKIPIN, et al., Re: ECF 15, 18 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Homelight, Inc. brings this action against defendant HomeOpenly, Inc. and its proprietor, Dmitry Shkipin, pursuant to federal law for trademark infringement and false advertising arising from content appearing on defendants’ website. Defendant Dmitry Shkipin, appearing pro se, now moves this Court to dismiss a single party, HomeOpenly, Inc., from plaintiff’s complaint (ECF 18) and to dismiss the complaint in its entirety (ECF 15). In its discretion, the Court concludes that defendant’s motions may be determined without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having carefully considered the pleadings, the parties’ briefs, the relevant legal authority, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES defendant’s motion to dismiss a single party (ECF 18) and motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.