Chatman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PRECIOUS CHATMAN, Case No. 3:22-cv-04849-WHO; Plaintiff, 3:22-cv-04850-WHO 8 v. GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

WEDRIVEU, INC, AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION

TO REMAND

Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 18 (case no. 22-cv-04849) 12 Dkt. Nos. 16, 22 (case no. 22-cv-04859) 13 14 Plaintiff Precious Chatman works for defendant company WeDriveU, a shuttle 15 transportation service based in the Bay Area. She brought a putative class action and a claim 16 arising under California’s Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) in state court, alleging 17 WeDriveU violated various California state workplace laws. As relevant here, Chatman asserts 18 that WeDriveU failed to pay proper overtime, meal period, and sick leave. She also argues 19 WeDriveU engaged in unfair business practices and failed to pay minimum wage, provide 20 required rest periods, provide accurate itemized wage statements, and reimburse employees for 21 business expenses. These violations, she says, also…