Arcell

Arcell v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20223:22-cv-02499California860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-02499-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY DISCOVERY PENDING

v. RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

GOOGLE LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 36 Defendants.

Plaintiffs initiated this antitrust suit on April 22, 2022. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiffs essentially allege that Defendants Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) and Google LLC (“Google”) violated federal antitrust laws by agreeing not to compete in the internet search business. Id. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint is fully briefed (Dkt. Nos. 25, 32, 35) and was taken under submission on October 26, 2022 (Dkt. No. 46). Pending before the Court is Defendants’ “Motion for a Protective Order Temporarily Staying Discovery” (“Motion”) until the Court issues a ruling on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint. Dkt. Nos. 36 -38. The Motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.