Pintor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SABAS PINTOR, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02878-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. TO DISMISS

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE Re: Dkt. No.

COMPANY,

11 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss, for a more definite statement, and to strike. (Dkt. No. 49.) After carefully considering the parties’ submissions, the Court concludes that oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the November 17, 2022 hearing, and DENIES in part and GRANTS in part Defendant’s motion as set forth below. 1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that it did not issue the insurance policy at issue is DENIED. Liberty relies entirely on the insurance policy itself, but the policy has the “Liberty Mutual Insurance” logo. (Dkt. No. 8-1 at 8.) Drawing all inferences in Plaintiff’s favor, the Court cannot conclude that defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company did not…