Etzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 22-cv-03742-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

FILING FEE IN FULL; DENYING

A ETZEL, MOTION TO CLARIFY Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 2,

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 6, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2) should not be denied pursuant to the three strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Dkt. No. 4. Plaintiff has filed a response. Dkt. No. 9. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to show cause why his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis should not be granted, Dkt. No. 10, and a “motion to clarify newly discovered evidence to the ‘imminent danger of serious physical injury,’” Dkt. No. 11. The Court construes…