B.
B. v. City of Oakland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZELDA B., et al., Case No. 21-cv-07078-DMR
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY
v. JUDGMENT
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 78 Defendants.
Plaintiffs Phyllis A. Thomas and Charles A. Thomas, Sr. along with their adult children and two minor grandchildren filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming Defendants City of Oakland (“Oakland”) and LaRichea Smith violated their constitutional rights and the Americans with Disabilities Act during a youth basketball game in February 2020. Defendants now move for summary judgment. [Docket No. 78.] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The following facts are undisputed except where noted. On February 15, 2020, Plaintiffs Phyllis A. Thomas and Charles A. Thomas,…