Perez-Pantoja

Clark v. Perez-Pantoja

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20225:22-cv-04460California1,892 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHESTER CLARK, Case No. 22-cv-04460-KAW

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

I. PEREZ-PANTOJA, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Chester Clark, a state prisoner incarcerated at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), has filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging the violation of his constitutional rights by Sergeant I. Perez-Pantoja. Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. The Court now addresses the claims asserted in Plaintiff’s complaint. DISCUSSION I. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.