Dream Big Media Inc. v. Alphabet Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20223:22-cv-02314California4,237 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DREAM BIG MEDIA INC., et al., Case No. 22-cv-02314-JSW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO

STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS

ALPHABET INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 29, 30 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court for consideration are the motion to dismiss and motion strike filed by Defendants Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. (collectively, “Google”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, and it finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Google’s motion to dismiss and DENIES Google’s motion to strike. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Dream Big Media, Getify Solutions, Inc. (“Getify”), and Sprinter Supplier LLC (“Sprinter Supplier”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are three businesses that allegedly use Google mapping services, including application programming…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.