Dali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20223:20-cv-06469California5,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DALI WIRELESS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-06469-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

CORNING OPTICAL IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

COMMUNICATIONS LLC, STRIKE

11 Defendant. Docket No. 157 12 13 Plaintiff Dali Wireless, Inc. (“Dali”) filed suit against Defendant Corning Optical Communications LLC (“Corning”) for willful infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,433,261 (“the ’261 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 9,197,358 (“the ’358 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 10,506,454 (“the ’454 patent”) (together, “the patents-in-suit”). Docket No. 154 (“TAC”). After its First and Second Amended Complaints were dismissed on the pleadings with leave to amend, Dali filed its Third Amended Complaint. Now pending before the Court is Corning’s combined motion to strike and motion to dismiss Dali’s willfulness allegations. Docket No. 157 (“MTD”). For the following reasons,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.