San Jose Healthcare System, LP v. Stationary Engineers Local 39 Pension Trust Fund

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20225:21-cv-09974California3,503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, LP, Case No. 21-cv-09974-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON REGIONAL MEDICAL

v. CENTER’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES STATIONARY ENGINEERS LOCAL 39 PENSION TRUST FUND, Re: Dkt. No. 54 8 Defendant. 9 Before the Court is the motion for Petitioner San Jose Healthcare System, LP d/b/a Regional Medical Center of San Jose (“RMC”) for attorney’s fees following the Court’s order granting RMC’s motion to vacate an arbitration award. Dkt. 54 (“Fees Motion”). Respondent Stationary Engineers Local 39 Pension Trust Fund (“Pension Fund”) opposes the Fees Motion. Dkt. 60 (“Opp.”). All Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. 23, 26. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES RMC’s motion for attorney’s fees I. BACKGROUND The facts of this case are discussed more fully in the Court’s June 15, 2022 Order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.