Bartfeld
Bartfeld v. AMCO Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 BRUCE BARTFELD, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05075-TSH
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. REMAND
AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 14 Defendant.
13 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant AMCO Insurance Company (“AMCO”), has removed this action from San Francisco Superior Court on diversity jurisdiction grounds. Plaintiffs Bruce and Jeri Bartfeld, individually and dba Bartfeld Sales, move for remand, arguing they named a John Doe defendant whose identity is not yet known but who is a real individual that destroys diversity jurisdiction. ECF No. 14. AMCO filed an Opposition (ECF No. 17) and Plaintiffs filed a Reply (ECF No. 20). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the November 17, 2022 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for…