Price

Price v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20224:22-cv-03173California1,080 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAUREN PRICE, Case No. 22-cv-03173-SK

Plaintiff,

NOTICE OF QUESTIONS

v.

TWITTER, INC., Regarding Docket No. 40 Defendant.

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED ON NOVEMBER 14, 2022, AT 9:30 A.M. The Court intends to address the questions below at the hearing. The Court advises the parties that it will not accept written answers to these questions. The parties shall be prepared to address the following questions at the hearing: (1) Twitter argues that Plaintiff does not allege that Twitter disclosed her email address and phone number to advertisers but only that Twitter matched her email address and phone number with advertiser’s lists of email addresses and phone numbers. However, in her Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Twitter allowed “advertisers to target specific groups of Twitter users by matching the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.