Harris

Harris v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20223:21-cv-04096California9,364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEXTER HARRIS,

Case No. 21-cv-04096-JCS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART: v. 1) ERA AND WORLEY’S MOTION

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

et al., AND DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

SECOND AMENDED

Defendants. COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

FRCP 12(B)(1), 12(B)(3) AND

12(B)(6); AND 2) PG&E’S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

14 Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 47

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Dexter Harris brings employment discrimination claims under Title VII and California law against Worley Group Inc. (“Worley”), Energy Resourcing America, Inc. (“ERA”) and Pacific Gas & Electric (“PG&E”), as joint employers. All three defendants contend Harris’s claims are subject to binding arbitration pursuant to an arbitration provision in an independent …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.