Kelly

Kelly v. San Mateo County Board of Supervisors

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20224:22-cv-02519California231 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KHALIL ALEXANDER KELLY,

Case No. 22-cv-02519-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

SAN MATEO COUNTY

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al., Defendants. a On September 23, 2022, the Court issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with

13 || leave to amend within twenty-eight days from the date of the order. The Court informed plaintiff

v 14 || that failure to file a timely amended complaint would result in the dismissal of his action with © || prejudice. Twenty-eight days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or 16 || communicated with the Court in any manner.

Accordingly, this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Yourish v.

California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 989, 992 (9th Cir. 1999) (affirming dismissal of action with || prejudice when plaintiff failed to amend complaint after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.