Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20225:21-cv-07822California814 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, Case No. 21-cv-07822-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR BRIEFING ON SUBJECT

v. MATTER JURISDICTION

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

10 Defendant. 11 In reviewing the motion pending before it, Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the administrative record, the question of whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action has arisen, a question which must be resolved before the Court can proceed. By way of relevant background, in the Complaint in this case, Plaintiff, acting pro se, states that he seeks review of a “final decision of the Commissioner [of Social Security]” regarding his claim for disability benefits and alleges that the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Dkt. 1. That section provides, in relevant part:

19 (g) Judicial review 20 Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.