Castro

Castro v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20225:22-cv-01829California3,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MIGUEL CASTRO, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01829-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.

13 Plaintiffs Miguel and Teresa Castro assert a single claim for negligence against the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. Dkt. No. 1. They seek money damages for personal injuries and property damage. Id. at 6. The United States moves for partial summary judgment and to limit plaintiffs’ damages to the “sum certain” stated in their administrative tort claims for property damage. Dkt. No. 21. The Castros oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 22.1 The Court held a hearing on this matter on November 1, 2022. Dkt. No. 26. Having considered the parties’ submissions and arguments made at the hearing, the Court grants the United States’ motion. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.