Yuksel
Yuksel v. Twitter Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDIP YUKSEL, Case No. 22-cv-05415-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. No. 17 TWITTER, INC., Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Pro se Plaintiff Edip Yuksel is suing Defendant Twitter, Inc. because it suspended his account. Pending before the Court is Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 17. Yuksel filed an Opposition (ECF No. 22) and Twitter filed a Reply (ECF No. 24). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Twitter’s motion for the following reasons.2 II. BACKGROUND Yuksel states he is “an internationally known author and human rights activist” who has “powerful cases against both Twitter and YouTube, which involve their international…