Abramowitz

Palantir Technologies Inc. v. Abramowitz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20225:19-cv-06879California4,797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC., Case No. 19-cv-06879-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. [Re: ECF No. 356-63, 365, 366] MARC L. ABRAMOWITZ, Defendant.

12 In preparation for trial the Court held the Final Pretrial Conference in this case on October 13, 2022, during which the Court issued oral rulings on the parties’ motions in limine. See Motions, ECF Nos. 356-63, 365, 366. The Court’s rulings on the parties’ motions in limine are set forth as follows. I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE A. Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence Regarding the i2 Litigation 19 Palantir seeks to exclude evidence regarding i2, Inc. et al v. Palantir Technologies, Inc., 20 No. 1:10-cv-0085-LO-JFA (E.D. Va.) (the “i2 Litigation”), in which i2 Inc. sued Palantir for, 21 among other things, trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract. See Pl.’s MIL No. 1, at 22 1, ECF No. 361. Palantir argues that evidence or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.