Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. Greenpeace International

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20224:17-cv-02824California11,554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., Case No. 17-cv-02824-JST (KAW) et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; v. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL, et al., FOR SANCTIONS 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 459, 461

13 Plaintiffs Resolute Forest Products, Inc., Resolute FP US, Inc., Resolute FP Augusta, LLC, 14 Fibrek General Partnership, Fibrek U.S., Inc., Fibrek International, Inc., and Resolute FB Canada, 15 Inc. (collectively, “Resolute”) filed the instant action against Defendants Greenpeace 16 International, Greenpeace, Inc., Greenpeace Fund, Inc., Daniel Brindis, Amy Moas, Matthew 17 Daggett, and Rolf Skar (collectively, “Greenpeace”). (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) at 1, Dkt. No. 18 185.) Resolute brings defamation claims based on Defendants’ December 2016 and May 2017 19…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.