Saddozai

Saddozai v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20225:20-cv-07534California4,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIKEB SADDOZAI, Case No. 20-cv-07534 BLF (PR)

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, AND OF SERVICE; DENYING

MOTION FOR RECUSAL;

v. DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE

DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR

NOTICE REGARDING SUCH M. B. ATCHLEY, et al.,

MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO

CLERK Defendants. 16 (Docket No. 39) 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendants at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). The Court dismissed the original, first, and second amended complaints with leave to amend to correct various deficiencies. Dkt. Nos. 14, 21, 36. The second amended complaint (“SAC”) was dismissed because it violated Rules 18(a) and 20(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, i.e., improperly joined unrelated claims against unrelated parties. Dkt. No. 36 at 3-4. The Court also found that the SAC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.