Vianu

Vianu v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20223:19-cv-03602California8,621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division IAN VIANU, ELIZABETH BLUM, and Case No. 19-cv-03602-LB DOMINIC GUTIERREZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

Plaintiffs, Re: ECF Nos. 152, 153 v.

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendant.

17 INTRODUCTION This is a class action against AT&T Mobility LLC. The plaintiffs — current and former wireless-service customers of AT&T — allege that AT&T engages in a “bait-and-switch scheme” with customers by advertising flat monthly rates for wireless-service plans but then (after customers sign up) “covertly” adding a monthly administrative fee.1 The plaintiffs’ claims are for violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), plus permanent public injunctive relief and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.2 The parties settled their case and the court 26 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.