Good Times Restaurants, LLC v. Shindig Hospitality Group, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20223:21-cv-07688California2,422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GOOD TIMES Case No. 21-cv-07688-AGT

RESTAURANTS, LLC,

Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS TO

DISMISS AND TO STRIKE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 60,

SHINDIG HOSPITALITY

GROUP, LLC,

Defendant.

Good Times Restaurants, LLC, and the third-party defendants have moved to dismiss some of Shindig Hospitality Group’s counterclaims and third-party claims and to strike one of Shindig’s requests for relief. Both motions will be denied.

I. MOTION TO DISMISS

The Court takes the well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint as true, construes them in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, and evaluates whether they state a plausible claim for relief. See Fort v. Washington, 41 F.4th 1141, 1144 (9th Cir. 2022). The Court treats the written instruments attached to the com- plaint, see dkts. 59-1, 59-2, 59-3, as “part of the pleading.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(c). A. Claim Under California’s Franchise Investment Law Good Times and third-party defendant Vikram Bhambri first move to dismiss Shindig’s claim under California’s Franchise Investment Law (CFIL), Cal. Corp. Code §§ 31000–31516. They argue that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.