Osinek
Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20223:13-cv-03891California7,261 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Case No. 13-cv-03891-EMC
RONDA OSINEK,
CONSOLIDATED MEMBER CASES Plaintiff,
9 v. Case No. 16-cv-01558-EMC Case No. 16-cv-05337-EMC PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC, Case No. 18-cv-01347-EMC et al., Case No. 21-cv-03124-EMC Case No. 21-cv-03894-EMC Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS TAYLOR’S
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
15 Docket No. 181 16 17 The above-referenced case consists of several consolidated cases that charge Kaiser entities with making false claims for payment to the federal government. The main claims asserted against the Kaiser entities are violations of the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”). Following the Court’s order of May 5, 2022, see Docket No. 171 (order), the following cases …