Muhmoud

Muhmoud v. City Of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20225:20-cv-08808California1,445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MUSTAFA MUHMOUD, Case No. 5:20-cv-08808-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER STAYING

v. DISCOVERY

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 82, 83, 89 Defendants.

Defendants Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and Shannon Smyth-Mendoza (collectively, “VTA Defendants”) move for a Rule 26(c) protective order to stay discovery (“Motion”) until their motion for judgment on the pleadings has been resolved. Dkt. No. 82. Defendants City of San Jose, Blage Zelalich, Christopher Creech, Paul Messier, Rick Galea, Leo Prescott, Dean Whipple, Carmen Dalpiaz, Vance Chang, and Ray Simpson (“City Defendants”) have also moved to join the Motion based on their pending motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 83; see also Dkt. No. 76 (collectively with Dkt. No. 79, the “Dispositive Motions”). The Court finds that this matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.