Osinek

Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20223:13-cv-03891California12,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Case No. 13-cv-03891-EMC

RONDA OSINEK,

CONSOLIDATED MEMBER CASES Plaintiff,

9 v. Case No. 16-cv-01558-EMC Case No. 16-cv-05337-EMC PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC, Case No. 18-cv-01347-EMC et al., Case No. 21-cv-03124-EMC Case No. 21-cv-03894-EMC Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS UNITED

STATES’ COMPLAINT IN

INTERVENTION

15 Docket No. 178 16 17 The above-referenced case consists of several consolidated cases that charge Kaiser entities with making false claims for payment to the federal government. The main claims asserted against the Kaiser entities are violations of the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”). Following the Court’s order of May 5, 2022, see Docket No. 171 (order), the following cases remain: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.